|
Journal of Commerce
2 September 1997
Waves of grain at a standstill in Russia
Lacking credit, farmers can't reap harvest
To hear government officials tell it, the late-summer fields
are bumper-full of grain, and Russia is about to enjoy a record harvest.
Russian Ministry of Agriculture officials were estimating a month ago
that a harvest of 80 million metric tons of grain were standing in the
fields, a record volume waiting to be gathered.
Agriculture Minister Victor Khlystun has been pushing his forecasts
upward recently. He claimed last week that this year, Russia's farmers
would reap 10 million tons more than they did last year, when the
official ministry total for the harvest was 69.3 million tons.
President Boris Yeltsin, at a chicken farm in Saratov province a few
days ago, declared: "The economic and agricultural indicators are good,
and they want to collect a record harvest this year."
Operative word
The operative word there is "want."
For government officials and farmers admit there can be no record,
unless the grain is reaped. According to the Ministry of Agriculture's
mechanization division, there is a shortage of 136,000 working combine
harvesters across the country. Fuel to power those machines that work,
and money to pay for spare parts and repairs, are also in desperate
shortage.
This was acknowledged by the less ebullient prime minister, Victor
Chernomyrdin, who made a tour of the southern Russian farm belt in July.
Blaming the commercial banks for charging 40% on farm credits, he said
the government is considering a proposal to provide loans at 12%. Even
if they are approved -- and such subsidized credits are opposed by the
deficit-cutters at the Ministry of Finance -- they won't arrive in time
for this year's harvest.
"I will make certain," Mr. Chernomyrdin said, "that everything will be
done to put bank credit in motion." High-quality farm machinery must
also be provided, he added.
Old system blamed
Tight-money advocates like First Deputy Prime Minister Anatoly Chubais,
who is also Russia's finance minister, blame the old Soviet system of
state and collective farming for inefficiency and mismanagement of the
credits they have received. He advocates reform of the state
land-holding system and radical privatization of farm ownership.
Legislation to achieve this has been defeated by Russia's Parliament. A
land code that restricts large-scale rural land sales was enacted by the
two chambers of Parliament, but it was vetoed by Mr. Yeltsin as the
harvest season began.
According to Robert McIntrye, an economics professor from Bowdoin
College, Maine, who is on a Fulbright teaching fellowship in Russia,
privatization of Russia's farms, since Mr. Yeltsin came to power, has
been "a fiasco." Combing through the property registers and analyzing
production figures since 1992, Mr. McIntyre says most of the collective
and state farms merely changed their names and re-registered themselves
as companies.
Of the tiny 4% of Russian farmers, who opted to leave the larger units
and create individual farms of their own, Mr. McIntyre says less than
one in 25 is "reported to have a marketable surplus. Most of the rest
are literally subsistence farms undertaken with the intention of feeding
only themselves and city relatives."
'Low productivity'
According to data gathered by Mr. McIntyre, the productivity figures of
the private plots that have operated in conjunction with collective
farms for years don't reveal how much of the inputs and costs were paid
out of the collective budget. On their own, private farming, says Mr.
McIntrye, has "extraordinarily low productivity."
Mr. McIntyre shares Prime Minister Chernomyrdin's assessment that lack
of cash and credit, and shortages of fuel and equipment explain part of
the reason Russia's farmers keep falling behind field projections. He
also blames European Union governments of heavily subsidizing food
exports to Russia that are sold at prices below even low Russian costs
of production.
"The effects of the EU's butter mountains and milk lakes are so strong
in Russia, not because of inherent weaknesses of collective agriculture,
but because the Russian government has failed to take fundamental
measures to protect its own producers until conditions stabilize
sufficiently."
First Deputy Trade Minister, Georgy Gabounia, agrees. His calculations
show that in the final Soviet years, 1989-91, state support of
agriculture in Russia was between $80 and $90 billion. "Now it's a
negative figure. That means the pricing of farm products is supporting
the rest of the economy."
|